Developmentrelevance: Average score for CRVS indicator.  An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health.  However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index.  A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies  to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.

IndicatorName: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data

Shortdefinition: Average score for CRVS indicator.


Developmentrelevance: Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level.  We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.

IndicatorName: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

License_Type: CC BY-4.0

Periodicity: Annual

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Unweighted average of indicators in this dimension.  Scores range from 0-1, with a score of 1 representing the best possible score.

Topic: Statistical Performance


Developmentrelevance: Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage.  This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited.  A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.

IndicatorName: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance


Developmentrelevance: Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators.  The following methods and standards are considered:  System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process.  . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.

IndicatorName: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods


Developmentrelevance: Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage and concerns that the indicator has biases that would lead to misleading incentives.  The indicator is based on PARIS21 SDG indicators (SDG 17.18.3 (national statistical plan that is fully funded and under implementation).

IndicatorName: Dimension 5.5: Finance


Developmentrelevance: Overall Statistical Performance Indicators Index Score

IndicatorName: SPI Overall Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of all statistical performance indicators.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


Developmentrelevance: Indicators that capture demand side of statistical system

IndicatorName: Pillar 1  - Data Use - Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of statistical performance indicators related to data use.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


Developmentrelevance: Information on data releases, online access, and other data services

IndicatorName: Pillar 2 - Data Services - Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of statistical performance indicators related to data services.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


Developmentrelevance: Whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs

IndicatorName: Pillar 3 - Data Products - Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of statistical performance indicators related to data products.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


Developmentrelevance: Censuses and surveys, admin data, geospatial

IndicatorName: Pillar 4 - Data Sources - Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of statistical performance indicators related to data sources.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


Developmentrelevance: Standards and methodology used in classification

IndicatorName: Pillar 5 - Data Infrastructure - Score

Statisticalconceptandmethodology: Weighted average of statistical performance indicators related to data infrastructure.  Scores range from 0-100 with 100 representing the best score.


IndicatorName: Learning Poverty Rate

Source: World Bank, Global Education Policy Dashboard


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 10 year old children who are out-of-school or in-school and not achieving basic proficiency on reading.


IndicatorName: Proficiency by End of Primary


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy by end of primary, as reported by UIS


IndicatorName: Learning poverty: Share of Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)

Source: World Bank


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Share of Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)


Generalcomments: Source Note: School Survey.  Percent of 4th grade students who are present during an unannounced visit.

IndicatorName: Student Attendance


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 4th grade students present during an unannounced visit


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 4th grade students present during an unannounced visit - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 4th grade students present during an unannounced visit - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 4th grade students present during an unannounced visit - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of 4th grade students present during an unannounced visit - Urban


IndicatorName: Financing


IndicatorName: Financing score; where a score of 1 indicates low effectiveness and 5 indicates high effectiveness in terms of adequacy, efficiency, and equity.


IndicatorName: (Financing) - Adequacy expressed by the per child spending


IndicatorName: (Financing) Efficiency - Expressed by the score from the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessment; where 0 is the lowest possible efficiency and 1 is the highest


IndicatorName: (Financing) Efficiency - Expressed by the relationship between financing and outcomes; where 0 is the lowest possible efficiency and 1 is the highest


IndicatorName: (Financing) - Equity


IndicatorName: Impartial Decision-Making


IndicatorName: Average score for Impartial Decision-Making; where a score of 1 indicates low effectiveness and 5 indicates high effectiveness


IndicatorName: (Impartial Decision-Making) average score for politicized personnel management


IndicatorName: (Impartial Decision-Making) average score for politicized policy-making


IndicatorName: (Impartial Decision-Making) average score for politicized policy implementation


IndicatorName: (Impartial Decision-Making) average score for employee unions as facilitators


IndicatorName: Mandates & Accountability


IndicatorName: Average score for Mandates & Accountability; where a score of 1 indicates low effectiveness and 5 indicates high effectiveness


IndicatorName: (Mandates & Accountability) Average score for coherence


IndicatorName: (Mandates & Accountability) Average score for transparency


IndicatorName: (Mandates & Accountability) Average score for accountability of public officials


IndicatorName: National Learning Goals


IndicatorName: Average score for National Learning Goals; where a score of 1 indicates low effectiveness and 5 indicates high effectiveness


IndicatorName: (National Learning Goals) Average score for targeting


IndicatorName: (National Learning Goals) Average score for monitoring


IndicatorName: (National Learning Goals) Average score for incentives


IndicatorName: (National Learning Goals) Average score for community engagement


IndicatorName: Characteristics of Bureaucracy


IndicatorName: Average score for Characteristics of Bureaucracy; where a score of 1 indicates low effectiveness and 5 indicates high effectiveness


IndicatorName: (Characteristics of Bureaucracy) average score for knowledge and skills


IndicatorName: (Characteristics of Bureaucracy) average score for work environment


IndicatorName: (Characteristics of Bureaucracy) average score for merit


IndicatorName: (Characteristics of Bureaucracy) average score for motivation and attitudes


IndicatorName: Content Knowledge

Longdefinition: School survey.  Fraction correct on teacher assessment.  In the future, we will align with SDG criteria for minimum proficiency.  We have dropped the "correct the letter" exercise from the teacher assessment, due to cross,country comparability issues.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subjects they teach


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subjects they teach - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subjects they teach - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subjects they teach - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subjects they teach - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of language


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of language - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of language - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of language - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of language - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of mathematics


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of mathematics - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of mathematics - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of mathematics - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers proficient in the subject of mathematics - Urban


Generalcomments: Source Note: School survey.  Percent of teachers present.  Teacher is coded absent if they are:   , not in school   - in school but absent from the class.

IndicatorName: Teacher Presence

Longdefinition: School survey.  Percent of teachers absent.  Teacher is coded absent if they are:   , not in school   - in school but absent from the class.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their classrooms, when they are scheduled to be teaching, during an announced visit


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their classrooms, when they are scheduled to be teaching, during an announced visit - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their classrooms, when they are scheduled to be teaching, during an announced visit - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their classrooms, when they are scheduled to be teaching, during an announced visit - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their classrooms, when they are scheduled to be teaching, during an announced visit - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their schools during an announced visit


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their schools during an announced visit - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their schools during an announced visit - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their schools during an announced visit - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers present in their schools during an announced visit - Urban


Generalcomments: Source Note: School survey.  Total score starts at 1 and points added are the sum  of whether a teacher has:   , Had a classroom observation in past year   - Had a discussion based on that observation that lasted longer than 30 min   - Received actionable feedback from that observation   - Teacher had a lesson plan and discussed it with another person

IndicatorName: Instructional Leadership

Longdefinition: School survey.  Total score starts at 1 and points added are the sum  of whether a teacher has:   , Had a classroom observation in past year   - Had a discussion based on that observation that lasted longer than 10 min   - Received actionable feedback from that observation   - Teacher had a lesson plan and discussed it with another person


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of instructional leadership


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of instructional leadership - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of instructional leadership - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of instructional leadership - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of instructional leadership - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having had their class observed


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having had their class observed - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having had their class observed - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having had their class observed - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having had their class observed - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the classroom observation happened recently


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the classroom observation happened recently - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the classroom observation happened recently - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the classroom observation happened recently - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the classroom observation happened recently - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having discussed the results of the classroom observation


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having discussed the results of the classroom observation - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having discussed the results of the classroom observation - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having discussed the results of the classroom observation - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having discussed the results of the classroom observation - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the discussion was over 30 minutes


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the discussion was over 30 minutes - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the discussion was over 30 minutes - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the discussion was over 30 minutes - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that the discussion was over 30 minutes - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they were provided with feedback in that discussion


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they were provided with feedback in that discussion - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they were provided with feedback in that discussion - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they were provided with feedback in that discussion - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they were provided with feedback in that discussion - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having lesson plans


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having lesson plans - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having lesson plans - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having lesson plans - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having lesson plans - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they had discussed their lesson plans with someone else (pricinpal, pedagogical coordinator, another teacher)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they had discussed their lesson plans with someone else (pricinpal, pedagogical coordinator, another teacher) - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they had discussed their lesson plans with someone else (pricinpal, pedagogical coordinator, another teacher) - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they had discussed their lesson plans with someone else (pricinpal, pedagogical coordinator, another teacher) - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they had discussed their lesson plans with someone else (pricinpal, pedagogical coordinator, another teacher) - Urban


IndicatorName: Monitoring


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report there is someone monitoring that basic inputs are available to students


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Number of basic infrastructure features clearly articulated as needing to be monitored


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report that parents or community members are involved in the monitoring of availability of basic inputs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report that there is an inventory to monitor availability of basic inputs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report there is someone monitoring that basic infrastructure is available


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report that parents or community members are involved in the monitoring of availability of basic infrastructure


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools that report that there is an inventory to monitor availability of basic infrastructure


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is the responsibility of monitoring basic inputs clearly articulated in the policies?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Number of basic inputs clearly articulated as needing to be monitored


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is the responsibility of monitoring basic infrastructure clearly articulated in the policies?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Inputs & Infrastructure) - Monitoring


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Inputs & Infrastructure) - Monitoring


Generalcomments: Source Note: School survey.  Total score is the sum  of whether a school has:   , Access to adequate drinking water   -Functional toilets that are separate for boys/girls, private, useable, and have hand washing facilities   - Electricity   - Internet   - School is accessible for those with disabilities (road access, a school ramp for wheelchairs, an entrance wide enough for wheelchairs, ramps to classrooms where needed, accessible toilets, and disability screening for seeing, hearing, and learning disabilities with partial credit for having 1 or 2 or the 3).)

IndicatorName: Basic Infrastructure

Longdefinition: School survey.  Total score is the sum  of whether a school has:   , Access to adequate drinking water   -Functional toilets that are separate for boys/girls, private, useable, and have hand washing facilities   - Electricity   - Visibility in the classroom   - School is accessible for those with disabilities (road access, a school ramp for wheelchairs, an entrance wide enough for wheelchairs, ramps to classrooms where needed, accessible toilets, and disability screening for seeing, hearing, and learning disabilities with partial credit for having 1 or 2 or the 3).)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of infrastructure aspects present in schools


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of infrastructure aspects present in schools - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of infrastructure aspects present in schools - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with drinking water


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with drinking water - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with drinking water - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with functioning toilets


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with functioning toilets - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with functioning toilets - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to electricity


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to electricity - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to electricity - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to internet


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to internet - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to internet - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools accessible to children with special needs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools accessible to children with special needs - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools accessible to children with special needs - Urban


Generalcomments: Source Note: School survey.  Total score is the sum of whether a school has:   , Functional blackboard    - Pens, pencils, exercise books   - Textbooks   - Fraction of students in class with a desk    - Used ICT in class and have access to ICT in the school.

IndicatorName: Basic Inputs

Longdefinition: School survey.  Total score is the sum of whether a school has:   , Functional blackboard    - Pens, pencils, exercise books </br> - Textbooks   - Fraction of students in class with a desk    - Used ICT in class and have access to ICT in the school.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of classroom inputs in classrooms


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of classroom inputs in classrooms - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of classroom inputs in classrooms - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with a functional blackboard and chalk


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with a functional blackboard and chalk - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with a functional blackboard and chalk - Urban


IndicatorName: (De facto) Percent of classrooms equipped with pens/pencils, textbooks, and exercise books


IndicatorName: (De facto) Percent of classrooms equipped with pens/pencils, textbooks, and exercise books - Rural


IndicatorName: (De facto) Percent of classrooms equipped with pens/pencils, textbooks, and exercise books - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with basic classroom furniture


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with basic classroom furniture - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of classrooms with basic classroom furniture - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to EdTech


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to EdTech - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools with access to EdTech - Urban


IndicatorName: Standards


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that students have access to the prescribed textbooks?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a policy in place to require that schools have access to drinking water?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that schools have functioning toilets?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a policy in place to require that schools have functioning toilets?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that schools are accessible to children with special needs?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is there a policy in place to require that schools are accessible to children with special needs?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a policy in place to require that students have access to the prescribed textbooks?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a national connectivity program?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a national connectivity program?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that students have access to PCs, laptops, tablets, and/or other computing devices?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a policy in place to require that students have access to PCs, laptops, tablets, and/or other computing devices?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that schools have access to electricity?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if there is a policy in place to require that schools have access to electricity?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy in place to require that schools have access to drinking water?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Inputs & Infrastructure) - Standards


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Inputs & Infrastructure) - Standards


Generalcomments: Source Note: School survey.  Percent of sampled 1st grade students scoring at least 80% on GEPD Direct Assessment. In such assessment, total equal points (100) are allocated equally across the 4 domains measured. These include numeracy, literacy, socioemotional skills, and executive function. Within each domain, all questions are given an equal weight.

IndicatorName: Readiness for Learning

Longdefinition: School survey.  Fraction correct on the Early Childhood Assessment given to students in school.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average developmental score for 1st Graders


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average developmental score for 1st Graders - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average developmental score for 1st Graders - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average developmental score for 1st Graders - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average developmental score for 1st Graders - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average numeracy score for 1st Graders


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average numeracy score for 1st Graders - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average numeracy score for 1st Graders - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average numeracy score for 1st Graders - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average numeracy score for 1st Graders - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average literacy score for 1st Graders


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average literacy score for 1st Graders - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average literacy score for 1st Graders - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average literacy score for 1st Graders - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average literacy score for 1st Graders - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average executive funcion score for 1st Graders


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average executive funcion score for 1st Graders - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average executive funcion score for 1st Graders - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average executive funcion score for 1st Graders - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average executive funcion score for 1st Graders - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average socioemotional score for 1st Graders


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average socioemotional score for 1st Graders - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average socioemotional score for 1st Graders - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average socioemotional score for 1st Graders - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average socioemotional score for 1st Graders - Urban


IndicatorName: Early Childhood Education


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy that guarantees free education for some or all grades and ages included in pre-primary education (for children age 0-83 months)?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children age 36-59 months who are attending an early childhood education programme


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are there developmental standards established for early childhood care and education?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) According to laws and regulations, are there requirement to become an early childhood educator, pre-primary teacher?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) According to policy, are ECCE professionals working at public or private centers required to complete in-service training in ECCE service delivery?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Learners) - Center-Based Care


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Learners) - Center-Based Care


Generalcomments: Source Note: The fraction of students scoring at least 20/24 points on 4th grade language and 14/17 points on the math student assessment.  Our team consulted several content experts to advise on how many of our math and language items a minimally proficient 4th grade student should be able to get correct to decide these thresholds.

IndicatorName: Proficiency on GEPD Assessment

Longdefinition: The fraction correct on 4th grade student assessment.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy according to GEPD School Survey


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy according to GEPD School Survey


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy according to GEPD School Survey - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy according to GEPD School Survey - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy according to GEPD School Survey - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy according to GEPD School Survey - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in numeracy according to GEPD School Survey


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in numeracy according to GEPD School Survey - Urban


IndicatorName: Caregiver Financial Capacity


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are anti poverty interventions that focus on ECD publicly supported?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are cash transfers conditional on ECD services/enrollment publicly supported?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are cash transfers focused partially on ECD publicly supported?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Coverage of social protection programs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Learners) - Caregiver Capacity – Financial Capacity


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Learners) - Caregiver Capacity – Financial Capacity


IndicatorName: Health Programs


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are young children required to receive a complete course of childhood immunizations?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children who at age 24-35 months had received all vaccinations recommended in the national immunization schedule


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy that assures access to healthcare for young children? Either by offering these services free or by subsidizing them


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of  children under 5 covered by health insurance


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are deworming pills funded and distributed by the government?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children age 6-59 months who received deworming medication


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy that guarantees pregnant women free antenatal visits and skilled delivery?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of women age 15-49 years with a live birth in the last 2 years whose most recent live birth was delivered in a health facility


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Learners) - Health


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Learners) - Health


IndicatorName: Nutrition Programs


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Does a national policy to encourage salt iodization exist?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of households with salt testing positive for any iodide among households


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Does a national policy exist to encourage iron fortification of staples like wheat, maize, or rice?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children age 6–23 months who had at least the minimum dietary diversity and the minimum meal frequency during the previous day


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Does a national policy exist to encourage breastfeeding?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children born in the five (three) years preceding the survey who were ever breastfed


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a publicly funded school feeding program?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of schools reporting having publicly funded school feeding program


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Learners) - Nutrition Programs


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Learners) - Nutrition Programs


IndicatorName: Caregiver Skills Capacity


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Does the government offer programs that aim to share good parenting practices with caregivers?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are any of the following publicly-supported delivery channels used to reach families in order to promote early childhood stimulation? Home visits, Group sessions, Community health programs, Health center waiting rooms, School-based groups, Mass media/Information campaigns


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children under age 5 who have three or more children’s books


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children age 24-59 months engaged in four or more activities to provide early stimulation and responsive care in the last 3 days with any adult in the household


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Learners) - Caregiver Capacity – Skills Capacity


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Learners) - Caregiver Capacity – Skills Capacity


Generalcomments: Source Note: School Survey.  Principals/head teachers are given two vignettes:   , One on solving the problem of a hypothetical leaky roof   - One on solving a problem of inadequate numbers of textbooks.    Each vignette is worth 2 points.      The indicator will measure two things: presence of functions and quality of functions. In each vignette:   - 0.5 points are awarded for someone specific having the responsibility to fix   - 0.5 point is awarded if the school can fully fund the repair, 0.25 points is awarded if the school must get partial help from the community, and 0 points are awarded if the full cost must be born by the community   - 1 point is awarded if the problem is fully resolved in a timely manner, with partial credit given if problem can only be partly resolved.

IndicatorName: Operational Management


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of core operational management functions


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of core operational management functions - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of core operational management functions - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of core operational management functions - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the presence and quality of core operational management functions - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for infrastructure repair/maintenance


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for infrastructure repair/maintenance - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for infrastructure repair/maintenance - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for infrastructure repair/maintenance - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for infrastructure repair/maintenance - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for ensuring  availability of school inputs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for ensuring  availability of school inputs - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for ensuring  availability of school inputs - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for ensuring  availability of school inputs - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for ensuring  availability of school inputs - Urban


IndicatorName: Pedagogical Skills

Longdefinition: School survey.  Based on TEACH ratings from classroom observations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good pedagogical skills (3 or above on Teach overall score)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good pedagogical skills (3 or above on Teach overall score) - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good pedagogical skills (3 or above on Teach overall score) - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good pedagogical skills (3 or above on Teach overall score) - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good pedagogical skills (3 or above on Teach overall score) - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good classroom culture practices (3 or above on Teach Classroom Culture score)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good classroom culture practices (3 or above on Teach Classroom Culture score) - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good classroom culture practices (3 or above on Teach Classroom Culture score) - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good classroom culture practices (3 or above on Teach Classroom Culture score) - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good classroom culture practices (3 or above on Teach Classroom Culture score) - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good instruction practices (3 or above on Teach Instruction score)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good instruction practices (3 or above on Teach Instruction score) - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good instruction practices (3 or above on Teach Instruction score) - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good instruction practices (3 or above on Teach Instruction score) - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good instruction practices (3 or above on Teach Instruction score) - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good practices on socioemotional skills (3 or above on Teach Socioemotional Skills score)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good practices on socioemotional skills (3 or above on Teach Socioemotional Skills score) - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good practices on socioemotional skills (3 or above on Teach Socioemotional Skills score) - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good practices on socioemotional skills (3 or above on Teach Socioemotional Skills score) - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers with good practices on socioemotional skills (3 or above on Teach Socioemotional Skills score) - Urban


IndicatorName: School Knowledge


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals are familiar with certain key aspects of the day-to-day workings of the school


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals are familiar with certain key aspects of the day-to-day workings of the school - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals are familiar with certain key aspects of the day-to-day workings of the school - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals are familiar with certain key aspects of the day-to-day workings of the school - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals are familiar with certain key aspects of the day-to-day workings of the school - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' content knowledge


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' content knowledge - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' content knowledge - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' content knowledge - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' content knowledge - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' experience


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' experience - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' experience - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' experience - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with teachers' experience - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with availability of classroom inputs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with availability of classroom inputs - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with availability of classroom inputs - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with availability of classroom inputs - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals familiar with availability of classroom inputs - Urban


IndicatorName: Management Practices

Longdefinition: Score of 1,5 based on sum of following:   - 1 Point. School Goals Exists    - 1 Point. School goals are clear to school director, teachers, students, parents, and other members of community (partial credit available)   - 1 Point. Specific goals related to improving student achievement ( improving test scores, improving pass rates, reducing drop out, reducing absenteeism, improving pedagogy, more resources for infrastructure, more resources for inputs)    - 1 Point. School has defined system to measure goals (partial credit available)


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master two key managerial skills - problem-solving in the short-term, and goal-setting in the long term


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master two key managerial skills - problem-solving in the short-term, and goal-setting in the long term - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master two key managerial skills - problem-solving in the short-term, and goal-setting in the long term - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master two key managerial skills - problem-solving in the short-term, and goal-setting in the long term - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master two key managerial skills - problem-solving in the short-term, and goal-setting in the long term - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master problem-solving in the short-term


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master problem-solving in the short-term - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master problem-solving in the short-term - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master problem-solving in the short-term - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master problem-solving in the short-term - Urban


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master goal-setting in the long term


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master goal-setting in the long term - Female


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master goal-setting in the long term - Male


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master goal-setting in the long term - Rural


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average score for the extent to which principals master goal-setting in the long term - Urban


IndicatorName: Proficiency by Grade 2/3


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of children proficient in literacy and numeracy by grade 2/3, as reported by UIS


IndicatorName: Attraction


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the national policies governing the education system portray the position of principal or head teacher as professionalized and distinct figure within schools?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average principal salary as percent of GDP per capita


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals reporting being satisfied or very satisfied with their social status in the community


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (School Management) - Attraction


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (School Management) - Attraction


IndicatorName: Clarity of Functions


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of the maintenance and expansion of school infrastructure?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of student learning assessments?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of principal hiring and assignment?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of principal hiring and assignment?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of principal supervision and training?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of principal supervision and training?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of maintenance and expansion of school infrastructure?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of the procurement of materials?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of procurement of materials?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of teacher hiring and assignment?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of teacher hiring and assignment?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of teacher supervision, training, and coaching?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Do the policies governing schools assign the responsibility of teacher supervision, training, and coaching?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Do you know if the policies governing schools assign responsibility for the implementation of student learning assessments?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (School Management) - Clarity of Functions


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (School Management) - Clarity of Functions


IndicatorName: Evaluation


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a policy that specifies the need to monitor principal or head teacher performance?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is the criteria to evaluate principals clear and includes multiple factors?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having been evaluated  during the last school year


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having been evaluated on multiple factors


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report there would be consequences after two negative evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report there would be consequences after two positive evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (School Management) - Evaluation


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (School Management) - Evaluation


IndicatorName: Selection & Deployment


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a systematic approach/rubric for the selection of principals?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is years of experience


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is quality of teaching


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is demonstrated management qualities


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is having a good relationship with the owner of the school


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is political affiliations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is ethnic group


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the most important factor considered when selecting a principal is knowledge of the local community


IndicatorName: (De Jure) How are the principals selected? Based on the requirements, is the selection system meritocratic?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include years of experience


IndicatorName: (De Facto)  Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include quality of teaching


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include demonstrated management qualities


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include good relationship with the owner of the school


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include political affiliations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include ethnic group


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report that the factors considered when selecting a principal include knowledge of the local community


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (School Management) - Selection & Deployment


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (School Management) - Selection & Deployment


IndicatorName: Support


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are principals required to have training on how to manage a school?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having used the skills they gained at the last training they attended


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average number of trainings that principals report having been offered to them in the past year


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are principals required to have management training for new principals?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are principals required to have in-service training?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Are principals required to have mentoring/coaching by experienced principals?


IndicatorName: (De Jure) How many times per year do principals have trainings?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report ever having received formal training


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having received management training for new principals


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having received in-service training


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of principals that report having received mentoring/coaching by experienced principals


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (School Management) - Support


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (School Management) - Support


IndicatorName: Attraction

Longdefinition: In the school survey, a number of De Facto questions on teacher attraction are asked.  0.8 points is awarded for each of the following:   , 0.8 Points. Teacher satisfied with job   - 0.8 Points. Teacher satisfied with status in community   - 0.8 Points. Would better teachers be promoted faster?   - 0.8 Points. Do teachers receive bonuses?   - 0.8 Points. One minus the fraction of months in past year with a salary delay.


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Average starting public-school teacher salary as percent of GDP per capita


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting being satisfied or very satisfied with their social status in the community


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting being satisfied or very satisfied with their job as teacher


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having received financial bonuses in addition to their salaries


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that there are incentives (financial or otherwise) for teachers to teach certain subjects/grades and/or in certain areas


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that performance matters for promotions


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Is there a well-established career path for teachers?


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report salary delays in the past 12 months


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Attraction


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Attraction


IndicatorName: Net Adjusted Enrollment Rate


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of primary school age children who are enrolled at primary education


IndicatorName: Evaluation

Longdefinition: School survey.  This policy lever measures whether there is a teacher evaluation system in place, and if so, the types of decisions that are made based on the evaluation results.  Score is the sum of the following:   , 1 Point. Was teacher formally evaluated in past school year?   - 1 Point total.  0.2 points for each of the following: Evaluation included evaluation of attendance, knowledge of subject matter, pedagogical skills in the classroom, students' academic achievement, students' socio-emotional development       - 1 Point.  Consequences exist if teacher receives 2 or more negative evaluations   - 1 Point. Rewards exist if teacher receives 2 or more positive evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Legislation assigns responsibility of evaluating the performance of teachers to a public authority (national, regional, local)


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Legislation assigns responsibility of evaluating the performance of teachers to the schools


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report being evaluated in the past 12 months


IndicatorName: (De Jure) The criteria to evaluate teachers is clear


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Number of criteria used to evaluate teachers


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report there would be consequences after two negative evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report there would be consequences after two positive evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Jure) There are clear consequences for teachers who receive two or more negative evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Jure) There are clear consequences for teachers who receive two or more positive evaluations


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Evaluation


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Evaluation


IndicatorName: Intrinsic Motivation

Longdefinition: School Survey. This lever measures whether teachers are intrinsically motivated to teach. The question(s) aim to address this phenomenon by measuring the level of intrinsic motivation among teachers as well as teacher values that may be relevant for ensuring that the teacher is motivated to focus on all children and not just some.  Score is sum of the following      , Max 1 point. Average response to battery of questions on whether teachers considers it acceptable to be absent in certain situations.  Average response scores scaled to be continuous score between 0-1.     - Max 1 point. Average response to battery of questions on whether teachers consider some students to be more deserving of attention.  Average response scores scaled to be continuous score between 0-1.    - Max 1 point. Average response to battery of questions on teachers growth mindset regarding students.  Average response scores scaled to be continuous score between 0-1.    - 1 point. Binary response to whether teacher said they became teacher, because teaching offered steady career.  Teacher scored 0 points if they reported wanting to teach for a steady career.


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "It is acceptable for a teacher to be absent if the assigned curriculum has been completed"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students can change even their basic intelligence level considerably"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers who state that intrinsic motivation was the main reason to become teachers


IndicatorName: (De Facto) New teachers are required to undergo a probationary period


IndicatorName: (De Jure) New teachers are required to undergo a probationary period


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "It is acceptable for a teacher to be absent if students are left with work to do"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "It is acceptable for a teacher to be absent if the teacher is doing something useful for the community"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students deserve more attention if they attend school regularly"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students deserve more attention if they come to school with materials"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students deserve more attention if they are motivated to learn"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students have a certain amount of intelligence and they really can’t do much to change it"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "To be honest, students can’t really change how intelligent they are"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that agree or strongly agrees with "Students can always substantially change how intelligent they are"


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Intrinsic Motivation


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Intrinsic Motivation


IndicatorName: Monitoring & Accountability

Longdefinition: School Survey.  This policy lever measures the extent to which teacher presence is being monitored, whether attendance is rewarded, and whether there are consequences for chronic absence. Score is the sum of the following:   , 1 Point. Teachers evaluated by some authority on basis of absence.   - 1 Point.  Good attendance is rewarded.    - 1 Point.  There are consequences for chronic absence (more than 30% absence).   - 1 Point. One minus the fraction of teachers that had to miss class because of any of the following: collect paycheck, school administrative procedure, errands or request of the school district office, other administrative tasks.


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Information on teacher presence/absenteeism is being collected on a regular basis


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Teachers receive monetary compensation for being present


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Teacher report receiving monetary compensation (aside from salary) for being present


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report having been absent because of administrative processes


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report that there would be consequences for being absent 40% of the time


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Monitoring & Accountability


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Monitoring & Accountability


IndicatorName: Selection & Deployment

Longdefinition: School Survey.  The De Facto portion of the Teacher Selection and Deployment Indicator considers two issues: how teachers are selected into the profession and how teachers are assigned to positions (transferred) once in the profession. Research shows that degrees and years of experience explain in little variation in teacher quality, so more points are assigned for systems that also base hiring on content knowledge or pedagogical skill.  2 points are available for the way teachers are selected and 2 points are available for deployment.     Selection   , 0 Points. None of the below   - 1 point.  Teachers selected based on completion of coursework, educational qualifications, graduating from tertiary program (including specialized programs), selected based on experience   - 2 points. Teacher recruited based on passing written content knowledge test, passed interview stage assessment, passed an assessment conducted by supervisor based on practical experience, conduct during mockup class.      Deployment   - 0 Points. None of the below   - 1 point.  Teachers deployed based on years of experience or job title hierarchy or other criteria   - 2 points. Teacher deployed based on performance assessed by school authority, colleagues, or external evaluator, results of interview.


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Requirements to enter into initial education programs


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average quality of applicants accepted into initial education programs


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Requirements to become a primary school teacher


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Requirements to become a primary school teacher


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Requirements to fulfill a transfer request


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Requirements to fulfill a transfer request


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Selectivity of teacher hiring process


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Selection & Deployment


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Selection & Deployment


IndicatorName: Support

Longdefinition: School survey.  Our teaching support indicator asks teachers about participation and the experience with several types of formal/informal training:      Pre,Service (Induction) Training:   - 0.5 Points. Had a pre-service training   - 0.5 Points.  Teacher reported receiving usable skills from training      Teacher practicum (teach a class with supervision)   - 0.5 Points. Teacher participated in a practicum   - 0.5 Points.  Practicum lasted more than 3 months and teacher spent more than one hour per day teaching to students.     In-Service Training:   - 0.5 Points. Had an in-service training   - 0.25 Points. In-service training lasted more than 2 total days   - 0.125 Points. More than 25% of the in-service training was done in the classroom.   - 0.125 Points. More than 50% of the in-service training was done in the classroom.     Opportunities for teachers to come together to share ways of improving teaching: <br>  - 1 Point if such opportunities exist.


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Practicum required as part of pre-service training


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent reporting they completed a practicum as part of pre-service training


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting that they participated in an induction and/or mentorship program


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Participation in professional development has professional implications for teachers


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers reporting having attended in-service trainings in the past 12 months


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average length of the trainings attended


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average span of time (in weeks) of those trainings


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Average percent of time spent inside the classrooms during the trainings


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Percent of teachers that report having opportunities to come together with other teachers to discuss ways of improving teaching


IndicatorName: (De Facto) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Support


IndicatorName: (De Jure) Policy Lever (Teaching) - Support


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of employer, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.

Source: Global Jobs Indicators Database, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/global-jobs-indicators-database)

Topic: Social Protection & Labor


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, female


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, male


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, rural


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-64, urban


IndicatorName: Average age of employers, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of self-employed or unpaid, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, female


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, male


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, rural


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-64, urban


IndicatorName: Average age of self-employed or unpaid workers, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Average age, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of the sample population. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average age, female


IndicatorName: Average age, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age, male


IndicatorName: Average age, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age, rural


IndicatorName: Average age, urban


IndicatorName: Average age, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, female


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, male


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, rural


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-64, urban


IndicatorName: Average age of wage workers, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of all workers between 15 and 64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, female


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, male


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, rural


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-64, urban


IndicatorName: Average age of workers, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, total

Shortdefinition: Average age of all workers in agriculture between 15 and 64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, female


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, above primary education


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, male


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 25-64


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, rural


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, urban


IndicatorName: Average age of workers in the agricultural sector, aged 15-24


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, female (% of female workers in the agricultural sector)

Shortdefinition: Share of wage workers in agriculture, aged 15-64, within all workers that work in the agricultural sector. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of workers with high education in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of workers with low education in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, male (% of male workers in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, total

Shortdefinition: Median earnings in the agricultural sector for wage workers per month aged 15-64 reported in local currency values. Currency values are typically reported for the year when the survey was conducted. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, female


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, above primary education


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, primary education and below


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, male


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 25-64, local currency values


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, rural


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, local currency values, urban


IndicatorName: Median earnings per month in the agricultural sector, aged 15-24, local currency values


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 25-64 (% of workers aged 25-64 in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural workers in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban workers in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-24 (% of workers aged 15-24 in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Wage employment in agriculture, aged 15-64, total (% of total workers in the agricultural sector)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, total (% of total population aged 17 and above)

Shortdefinition: Average number of completed years in formal education for all individuals that are aged 17 or adulter. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, female (% of female population aged 17 and above)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, above primary education (% of population aged 17 and above with high education)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, primary education and below (% of population aged 17 and above with low education)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, male (% of male population aged 17 and above)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 25 and above (% of population aged 25 and above)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, rural (% of rural population aged 17 and above)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17 and above, urban (% of urban population aged 17 and above)


IndicatorName: Average number of completed years in formal education, aged 17-24 (% of population aged 17-24)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, female (% of female youth labor force)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed young individuals participating in the active labor force aged 15-24. Must add to 100 percent with share of employed young individuals participating in the active labor force aged 15-24. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, above primary education (% of youth labor force with high education)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, primary education and below (% of youth labor force with low education)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, male (% of male youth labor force)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, rural (% of rural youth labor force)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, urban (% of urban youth labor force)


IndicatorName: Youth employment rate, aged 15-24, total (% of total youth labor force)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, female (% of female labor force in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals participating in the active labor force in working age (15-64). Must add to 100 percent with share of unemployed individuals participating in the active labor force in working age (15-64). The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of labor force with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of labor force with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, male (% of male labor force in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 25-64 (% of labor force aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, rural  (% of rural labor force in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban labor force in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-24 (% of labor force aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment rate, aged 15-64, total (% of total labor force in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in agriculture aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the agricultural sector, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the armed forces occupation group, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the clerks occupation group, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the construction sector, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the construction sector, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the commerce sector, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals with a work contract in working age. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the craft workers occupation group, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in public utilities sector, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the eletricity and public utilities sector, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)


IndicatorName: Employment in the elementary occupation group, aged 15-64, total (% of total employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, female (% of female employed population in working age)

Shortdefinition: Share of employed individuals working in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64. The sub-groups are: Urban shows the results for only the urban population, rural shows the results for the rural population, youth shows the results for the young population between 15 to 24 years, adult shows the results for the adults aged between 25 to 64 years, male shows the results for the male population and female shows the results for the female population. Low educated shows the results for those with primary education or less, and high educated shows the results for everyone who obtained a higher education.


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, above primary education (% of employed population with high education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, primary education and below (% of employed population with low education in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, male (% of male employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 25-64 (% of employed population aged 25-64)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age)


IndicatorName: Employment in the financial and business services sector, aged 15-24 (% of employed population aged 15-24)